2026

• Voinea, Cristina, Christopher Register, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Brian D. Earp & Julian Savulescu. (2026) The Sorrows of Young Chatbot Users: Harm and Responsibility in Human-AI Relationships. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-026-10371-z
• Zahiu, Anda & Alexandra  Zorila. (2026) Experiments in living with social virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology 28, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-026-09900-6

2025

• Constantinescu Mihaela, Muel Kaptein. (2025) Responsibility Gaps, LLMs & Organisations: Many Agents, Many Levels, and Many Interactions. Science and Engineering Ethics 31, 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00560-1
• Constantinescu Mihaela.(2025) Do GenAI avatars open new responsibility gaps?. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02660-9 
• Mihailov, Emilian, Hannikainen, Ivar R. and Wiegmann, Alex (2025) ‘Sacrificing objects instead of persons: Order effects without emotional engagement’, Philosophical Psychology, 38(2), pp. 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2195043
• Marin, Lavinia & Constantin Vică. (2025) Hic sunt leones. User orientation as a design principle for emerging institutions on social media platforms. AI & Soc 40, 1613–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01932-0
• Felber, Nadine A., Mihailov, Emilian & Wangmo, Tenzin (2025) ‘Virtual reality as a possible aged care technology – opportunities and prejudices from older persons and their caregivers in a qualitative study’, Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6, 1502450. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1502450
• Mihailov, Emilian (2025) ‘Enlightened beneficence: A Kantian alternative to effective altruism’, Res Publica, 31, pp. 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-025-09727-w
• Mihailov, Emilian & Tenzin Wangmo (2025) ‘Does humanness matter? An ethical evaluation of sharing care work with social robots’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 31, 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00547-y
• Wangmo, Tenzin, Tian, Y. J. Anna, Mihailov, Emilian et al. (2025) ‘Mapping ethical blind spots in the use of new technologies to support elder care’, Bioethical Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10502-y
• Constantinescu, Mihaela, Radu Uszkai, Diana Mocanu, George Bogateanu & Stefano Dafarra (2025). Physical and Digital GenAI Avatars: Do Interactive Representations of Individual Human Persons Have Agency and Moral Responsibility?. In Social Robots with AI: Prospects, Risks, and Responsible Methods (pp. 591-597). IOS Press. 10.3233/FAIA241549

2024

• Samuel Iglesias, Brian D. Earp, Cristina Voinea, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Anda Zahiu, Nancy S. Jecker, and Julian Savulescu. (2024). “Digital Doppelgängers and Lifespan Extension: What Matters?” The American Journal of Bioethics, November, 1–16. doi:10.1080/15265161.2024.2416133.
• Ethan Landes, Cristina Voinea & Radu Uszkai (2024). Rage against the authority machines: how to design artificial moral advisors for moral enhancement. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02135-3
• Cristina Voinea, Tenzin Wangmo & Constantin Vică (2024). Paternalistic AI: the case of aged care. Humanities and Social Sciences Communication 11, 824. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03282-0
• Tenzin Wangmo, Vanessa Duong, Nadine Andrea Felber, Yi Jiao (Angelina) Tian, Emilian Mihailov (2024). No playing around with robots? Ambivalent attitudes toward the use of Paro in elder care. Nursing Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12645 
• Lavinia Marin, Constantin Vică (2024). Hic sunt leones. User orientation as a design principle for emerging institutions on social media platforms. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01932-0.
• Mihaela Constantinescu (2024) Organisational integrity and responsibility. In M. Kaptein (ed.), Research Handbook on Organisational Integrity, Edaward Elgar Publishing, pp. 394-414. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803927930.00033.
• Mihailov, Emilian (2024) ‘Is the house of smart technologies less human? Challenges to human dignity in the care of older persons’, in Robots and Gadgets: Aging at Home, p. 119.
• Wangmo, Tenzin, Duong, Vien, Felber, Nadine A., Tian, Y. J. Anna and Mihailov, Emilian (2024) ‘No playing around with robots? Ambivalent attitudes toward the use of Paro in elder care’, Nursing Inquiry, 31(3), e12645. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12645
• Iftode, Cristian, Alexandra Zorilă, Constantin Vică & Emilian Mihailov (2024) ‘Experimental and relational authenticity: how neurotechnologies impact narrative identities’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 23(4), pp. 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09825-7 
• Iftode, Cristian, Alexandra Zorila & Anda Zahiu. (2024). “Love Drugs and the Authenticity Charge: Why Narrative Templates Matter.” AJOB Neuroscience 15 (4): 246–48. doi:10.1080/21507740.2024.2402223.
• Buyukbabani, Mey Bahar, Brian D. Earp, Ivar Hannikainen, Tommaso Barba, Emilian Mihailov, David B. Yaden, and Julian Savulescu. (2024). “Moral Attitudes Toward Pharmacologically Assisted Couples Therapy: An Experimental Bioethics Study of Real-World ‘Love Drugs.’” AJOB Neuroscience 15 (4): 239–43. doi:10.1080/21507740.2024.2402221.
• Voinea, Cristina, Lavinia Marin & Constantin Vică. (2024) Digital Slot Machines: Social Media Platforms as Attentional Scaffolds. Topoi 43, 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10031-0
• Voinea, Cristina, Tenzin Wangmo & Constantin Vică.(2024) Paternalistic AI: the case of aged care. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11, 824. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03282-0
• Nica, Daniel & Ana-Maria Hojbotă.(2024) Educating for Authenticity? A Discussion of Impression Management in the Context of Cross-Neurotype and Cross-Cultural Communication with Possible Implications for Education, Revista Românească pentru Educație Multidimensională, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.4/921
• Nica, Daniel. (2024) Ameliorare, autenticitate și auto-creație, Revista de Filosofie, Volum LXX, Nr. 5, pp. 687-698. 10.59277/RF.2024.71.5.05
• Uszkai, Radu (2024). „Fostering intellectual and ethical virtues in the age of Artificial Intelligence: The need for educators-in-the-loop.” School Children and the Challenge of Managing AI Technologies. Routledge. Pp. 18-27. DOI: 10.4324/9781032694283-4

2023

• Cristian Iftode, Alexandra Zorilă, Constantin Vică, Muriel Leuenberger. 2023. “ A Life of Our Own: Why Authenticity is More Than a Condition for Autonomy”, The Journal of Value Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-023-09967-0 
• Tenzin Wangmo, Veerle Provoost, Emilian Mihailov. 2023. “The Vagueness of Integrating the Empirical and the Normative: Researchers’ Views on Doing Empirical Bioethics”, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10286-z 
• Cristian Iftode. 2023. “Motivational Enhancement: What Ancient Technologies of the Self and Recent Biotechnologies Have in Common”, The New Bioethics. 10.1080/20502877.2023.2269635
• Anda Zahiu, Emilian Mihailov, Brian D. Earp, Kathryn B. Francis, Julian Savulescu. 2023. “Empathy Training Through Virtual Reality: Moral Enhancement with the Freedom to Fall?”, Ethics and Information Technology 25 (50). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09723-9  
• Paul McKee, Hyo-eun Kim, Honghong Tang, Jim A. C. Everett, Vladimir Chituc, Toni Gibea, Lucas Murrins Marques, Paulo Boggio, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2023. “Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders”. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3
• Emilian Mihailov, Ivar R. Hannikainen, Alex Wiegmann. 2023. “Sacrificing objects instead of persons: Order effects without emotional engagement”, Philosophical Psychology. 10.1080/09515089.2023.2195043
• Emilian Mihailov, Cristina Voinea, Constantin Vică. 2023. “Is Online Moral Outrage Outrageous? Rethinking the Indignation Machine”. Science and Engineering Ethics 29, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00435-3
• Cristina Voinea, Lavinia Marin, Constantin Vică. 2023. “The moral source of collective irrationality during COVID-19 vaccination campaigns”, Philosophical Psychology 36:5, 949-968. 10.1080/09515089.2022.2164264

2022

• Cristian Iftode, Alexandra Zorilă, Constantin Vică, Emilian Mihailov. 2022. “Experimental and relational authenticity: how neurotechnologies impact narrative identities” , Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09825-7
• Alexandra Zorila. 2022. “Neurotechnologies and Identity Changes: What the Narrative View Can Add to the Story”, AJOB Neuroscience, 14:1, 48-50, DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2022.2150713
• Cristina Voinea, Tenzin Wangmo, Constantin Vică. 2022. „Respecting Older Adults: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10164-6 
• Emilian Mihailov. 2022. „Measuring Impartial Beneficence: A Kantian Perspective on the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00600-2   

2021

 

2020

• Cristina Voinea, Constantin Vică, Emilian Mihailov, Julian Savulescu. 2020. „The internet as cognitive enhancement”. Science and Engineering Ethics 26(4): 2345-2362, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-020-00210-8.
• Brian D Earp, Joanna Demaree-Cotton, Michael Dunn, Vilius Dranseika, Jim AC Everett, Adam Feltz, Gail Geller, Ivar R Hannikainen, Lynn A Jansen, Joshua Knobe, Julia Kolak, Stephen Latham, Adam Lerner, Joshua May, Mark Mercurio, Emilian Mihailov, David Rodríguez-Arias, Blanca Rodríguez López, Julian Savulescu, Mark Sheehan, Nina Strohminger, Jeremy Sugarman, Kathryn Tabb, Kevin Tobia. 2020. „Experimental philosophical bioethics”. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11(1): 30-33, https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2020.1714792.
• Constantin Vică. 2020. „The world is a big network. Pandemic, the Internet and institutions”. Revista de filosofie aplicată 3(S1): 136-161, http://filosofieaplicata.ro/index.php/filap/article/view/65.
• Constantin Vică. 2020. „Exerciții negative în dialectica digitală și o reconstrucție hegeliană”. Hegel 250, Alexandru Surdu, Sergiu Bălan, Ștefan-Dominic Georgescu, editori, București: Editura Academiei.

 

2019

• Constantin Vică, Emanuel-Mihail Socaciu. 2019. “Mind the gap! How the digital turn upsets intellectual property​”. Science and Engineering Ethics 25: 247–264, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-017-9996-x.
• Emilian Mihailov. 2019. „Refocusing the Nudge Debate on Organ Donation”. Contemporary Debates in Bioethics: European Perspectives, Emilian Mihailov, Tenzin Wangmo, Victoria Federiuc și Bernice Elger, editori, p. 58-71. Berlin: De Gruyter/Sciendo, https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110571219-007.
• Mihaela Constantinescu. 2019. „Seeing the Forest Beyond the Trees: A Holistic Approach to Health-Care Organizational Ethics”. Contemporary Debates in Bioethics: European Perspectives, Emilian Mihailov, Tenzin Wangmo, Victoria Federiuc și Bernice Elger, editori, p. 86-96. Berlin: De Gruyter/Sciendo, https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110571219-009.
• Constantin Vică. 2019. „The Info-Computational Turn in Bioethics”. Contemporary Debates in Bioethics: European Perspectives, Emilian Mihailov, Tenzin Wangmo, Victoria Federiuc și Bernice Elger, editori, p. 108-120. Berlin: De Gruyter/Sciendo, https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110571219-011.
• Anda Zahiu. 2019. ”I, avatar. Towards an extended theory of selfhood in immersive VR”, Információs Társadalom, 19(4): 147-158. 10.22503/inftars.XIX.2019.4.10
• Cristian Iftode. 2019. „Bioethics as Biopolitics: A Foucauldian Perspective”. Contemporary Debates in Bioethics: European Perspectives, Emilian Mihailov, Tenzin Wangmo, Victoria Federiuc și Bernice Elger, editori, p. 145-159. Berlin: De Gruyter/Sciendo, https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110571219-014.
• Constantin Vică, Cristina Voinea. 2019. „Artificial Intelligence, Robots and the Ethics of the Future”. Revue Roumaine de Philosophie, 63(2): 224–234.

 

2018

• Emilian Mihailov, Julian Savulescu. 2018. “Social Policy and Cognitive Enhancement: Lessons from Chess”. Neuroethics 11 (2): 115-127, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12152-018-9354-y
• Emilian Mihailov, Alexandru Dragomir. 2018. “Will cognitive enhancement create post‐persons? The use(lessness) of induction in determining the likelihood of moral status enhancement”. Bioethics 32 (5): 308-313, https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12437.
• Cristina Voinea. 2018. “Designing for conviviality”. Technology in Society 52: 70-78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.07.002.

 

2017

• Constantin Vică. 2017. “New and Emerging Technologies. From Moral Intuitions to Ethical Theories”. Annals of the University of Bucharest – Philosophy Series, 66 (2): 3-8, http://annals.ub-filosofie.ro/index.php/annals/article/view/247.
• Constantin Vică, Bogdan Iancu. 2017. “Post-adevăr și «fake news». De la tribalizare la filtre”. Sfera Politicii, 1-2 (191-192): 30-43, http://www.sferapoliticii.ro/sfera/191-192/art04-Iancu.php
• Cristina Voinea, Constantin Vică. 2017. “Kynici și cinici în jocul politic al informației”, în Cristian Iftode, Cristina Voinea (eds.), Critică, marginalitate, cinism, p. 153-178. București: Editura Universității din București (http://editura-unibuc.ro/magazin/stiinte-socio-umane/critica-marginalitate-cinism/).
• Radu Uszkai. 2017. “Raționalitate și utilitate la Robert Nozick: între evoluționism și functionalism”, în Vasile Macoviciuc (ed.), Filosofie și Economie. Sensuri ale utilității în științele socioumane, p. 458-476, București: Editura ASE.
• Radu Uszkai. 2017. “Intellectual Property has no Personality”, Annals of the University of Bucharest: Philosophy Series, 66 (2): 181-205.
• Anda Zahiu. 2017. ”Bernard Harcourt’s „Exposed. Desire and Disobedience in the Digital Age”, Public Reason, 9(1-2): 109-112.  
• Valentin Mureșan. 2017. “Ethics–Information or Giving-Form?”. Postmodern Openings, 8 (1): 9-14.
• Emilian Mihailov. 2017. “Complexitatea judecării morale: limitele abordărilor procedurale și tipuri de contexte”. Ideo:  Romanian Journal of Philosophical and Social Studies 2 (1): 51-66.

 

2016

• Emilian Mihailov. 2016. “Is Deontology a Moral Confabulation?”. Neuroethics. 9 (1): 1-13.
• Constantin Vică. 2016. “Spațiul și timpul în lumea digitală în rețea. Un examen critic kantian” (“Space and Time in the Networked Digital World. A Kantian Critical Examination”). Revista de filosofie, 53 (5): 539-554. www.institutuldefilosofie.ro/request.php?601
• Cristina Voinea. 2016. “Guvernare fără guvernanți: politica prin algoritmi și Big Data” (“Governance without governors: politics through algorithms and Big Data”). Revista de filosofie, 53 (5): 583-595.
• Radu Uszkai. 2016. “Pirateria online: un tip de infracțiune fără victime” (“Is piracy a victimless crime?”). Revista de filosofie, 53 (5): 597-610.
• Mureșan, Valentin. 2016. “Ethical Cleaning and Moral Efficiency in Organizations”. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal. 6 (1-2): 151-161.
• Mureșan, Valentin. 2016. “The Moral Life and Its Theory in Romania. A Subjective Panorama”. Postmodern Openings. 7 (1): 9-17.
• Mureșan, Valentin. 2016. “Thoughts on the New Ethics Expertise. Book Review”. Postmodern Openings. 7 (1): 179-182.
• Ienca, M., Jotterand, F., Vică, C., Elger, B. 2016. “Social and Assistive Robotics in Dementia Care: Ethical Recommendations for Research and Practice”. International Journal of Social Robotics. 8 (4): 565-573.
• Gibea, Toni. 2016.“Does experimental ethics have a normative account?”. Balkan Journal of Philosophy. 8 (1): 85-92.

 

2015

• Leabu, Mircea, Mureșan, Valentin. 2015. “Preface: Life’s Complexity, Complexity of Ethics”. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal. 6 (1-2): 45-47.
• Mihailov, Emilian. 2015. “Does the Origin of Normativity Stem from the Internalization of Dominance Hierarchies?”. Symposion. 2 (4): 463-478.
• Mihailov, Emilian. 2015. “The Argument from Self-Defeating Beliefs Against Deontology”. Ethical Perspectives. 22 (4): 573-600.
• Leabu, Mircea, Mureșan, Valentin. 2015. “Preface: Life’s Complexity, Complexity of Ethics”. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal. 6 (1-2): 45-47.
• Nica, Daniel. 2015. “Nietzsche and Foucault on Self-Creation: Two Different Projects”. Annals of the University of Bucharest. Philosophy Series. 64 (1): 21-41.
• Nica, Daniel. 2015. “Opera de artă fără autor. O perspectivă foucauldiană asupra ideii de autocreație în opera lui Nietzsche”. Revista de Filosofie. (2): 209-221.
• Socaciu, E., Uszkai, R. 2015. “How Drug Patents Might Lead to Disincentives for Moral Bioenhancement”. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal. 6 (1-2): 125-137.
• Vică, Constantin. 2015. “Intellectual Property, Globalization, and Left-Libertarianism”. Symposion. 2 (3): 323-345.

 

2014

• Constantinescu, M., Kaptein, M. 2014. “Mutually Enhancing Responsibility: A Theoretical Exploration of the Interaction Mechanisms Between Individual and Corporate Moral Responsibility”. Journal of Business Ethics. 129 (2): 325-339.
• Uszkai, Radu. 2014. “Are Copyrights Compatible with Human Rights?”. The Romanian Journal of Analytic Philosophy. 8 (1): 5-20.

 

2013

• Constantinescu, Mihaela. 2013. “Attributions of moral responsibility: from Aristotle to corporations”. Annals of the University of Bucharest. Philosophy Series. 62 (1): 19-37.
• Leabu, Mircea. 2013. “Maternity at Advanced Ages. Ethical Concerns Related to the Assisted Reproductive Technology from a Scientific and Religious Perspective”. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal. 3 (1-3): 29-50.
• Leabu, Mircea. 2013. “Plagiarism: A Complex and Controversial Form of Academic Misconduct”. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal. 4 (2): 131-151.
• Mihailov, Emilian. 2013. “The Normativity of Kant’s Formula of Law of Nature”. Romanian Journal of Analytic Philosophy. (2): 57-81.
• Mureșan, Valentin. 2013. “An Organization’s Moral Topography”. Transylvanian Review. 22 (1): 33-46.
• Nica, Daniel. 2013. “Narrative and Justification in Moral Particularism”. Romanian Journal of Analytic Philosophy. (2): 22-32.
• Buda, O. et al. 2013. “The institutionalization of asylum and forensic psychiatry in Bucharest, 19th century. A historical outline.” Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine. 21 (1): 79-84.
• Staicu, Laurențiu. 2013. “Natural Science and the Evolution of Categorial Discourse”. Philosophy Study.  3 (2): 131-143.
• Voinea, Cristina. 2013. “Inconsistencies in prevalent approaches to intellectual property”. Annals of the University of Bucharest. Philosophy Series. 62 (1): 49-58.

 

2012

• Leabu, Mircea. 2012. “Christianity and bioethics. Seeking arguments for stem cell research in Genesis”. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies. (31): 72-78.
• Mureșan, Valentin. 2012. “A Pluralist Ethical Decision-making Procedure”. Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy. 4: 11-21.
• Socaciu, E., Uszkai, R. 2012. “Fusionism, Religion and the Tea Party”. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies. 11 (33): 89-106.
• Staicu, Laurențiu. 2012. “Human Cloning and the Myth of Disenchantment”. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies. 11 (31): 148-169.
• Cernea, M.-V., Uszkai, R. 2012. “The Clash between Global Justice and Pharmaceutical Patents: A Critical Analysis”. Public Reason. 4 (1-2): 210-221.
• Uszkai, R., Vică, C. 2012. “How to assess the emergence of the European Pirate Parties. Towards a research agenda”. Sfera Politicii. 169: 46-55.
• Uszkai, Radu. 2012. “Aristotle’s Account of Akrasia. Towards a Contemporary Analogy.” Annales Philosophici. 5: 85-90.
• Ștefănescu, M., Vică, C. 2012. “Climate Change, Intellectual Property, and Global Justice”. Public Reason. 4 (1-2): 197-209.

 

2011

• Leabu, Mircea. 2011. “A Framework for Assessment and Management of Ethical Risks Related to Stem Cell Use in Tissue Engineering”. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal. 2 (4): 333-345.
• Leabu, Mircea. 2011. “Principlism versus Utilitarianism In Translational Medicine Ethics”. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai – Philosophia. (2): 53-63.
• Nica, Daniel. 2011. “Originile disputei etice dintre particularism și generalism: Platon și Aristotel”. Annals of the University of Bucharest. Philosophy Series. (2): 51-63.
• Vică, Constantin. 2011. “Relația etică-politică în filosofia practică aristotelică”. Annals of the University of Bucharest. Philosophy Series. 60 (2): 39-50.